A colleague of mine pointed out this story today about the birth of quadruplets and how it made her misty to see such a happy ending. She is a conservative religious person and also pointed out how the couple had turned down the offer of selective reduction and everything worked out.
I am really happy for this couple too, and happy that they were able to beat the odds and deliver their quads healthy at 33 weeks gestation. But I knew of another mom in the same town a few years ago who had also turned down selective reduction and lost her quads at something like 22 weeks. And I kept thinking about how this story must make that other mom feel. And how it must make the other moms who at one time had been pregnant with multiples but did not beat the odds.
[I'm not advocating selective reduction and am not advocating against selective reduction. I think it's an individual choice that individuals must make with the risks in mind. There are risks of continuing with high order multiple gestation, but there are also risks that go with selective reduction.]
Indeed, my reaction to the story was to think about how many women would read it and be sad. Not because they are bitter. But because they miss their babies. My colleague suggested that the emotions of grief can be “channeled for good things.”
No doubt this is true, but when confronted with a story of the loss of quadruplets, do you tell the mom about the good work she should be doing? I don’t think so. Instead you let the person experiencing the grief guide the discussion. I think that Melissa had an excellent post on just this issue today.
I should have stopped having the conversation with this colleague, who is normally someone I genuinely like, in spite of our religious and political differences. But I didn’t. I told her about some other moms I knew who had gone through horrendous losses — one whose IVF baby was stillborn. And her response was “don’t some women have to face that maybe they aren’t supposed to be a mother through biological means?”
This question was tremendously offensive to me. I stopped the conversation soon after that. And I don’t think my emotional response was just a side effect of the Lupron.
On its surface the question itself asks something that someone wonders in a straightforward way: Don’t some women have to face that maybe they aren’t supposed to be mothers through biological means? (something that some of us may eventually have to accept.) But it skips over the tremendous grief that comes with losing a full term pregnancy. It skips over the the feelings of loss of identity and physical and emotional inadequacy that come with infertility. It ignores the fact that many of us feel screwed or abandoned by the God/the Universe.
It’s like asking a cancer patient, well, why can’t you just accept that your body has turned against itself? Or an obese person: don’t you know you need to stop eating so much and exercise? Or an unconnected person: can’t you just accept your career is going nowhere because you don’t know the right people and you never will?
Not useful comments.